|
Scenario A: Short-lived, contained shock; temporary oil spike, Hormuz disruption avoided
- WARC’s baseline scenario, which results in 10.4% ad market growth in 2026
- Risks 0.2pp of global economic growth, adds 0.5pp to inflation, and dampens real household spend by 0.3pp
- Travel & transport sector decreases ad spend by 3.5%, though the impact is more muted on other categories
Our baseline scenario predicts global ad market growth of 10.4% to a total of $1.32trn this year, an upgrade of 1.3pp from our last forecast in December owing to strong performances from the major online platforms carrying into the start of the new year.
This scenario assumes an oil price holding around $100 per barrel for up to six months, before normalising in the fourth quarter. Second-order inflation is limited in this scenario, and central banks, mindful of economic fragility, do not tighten fiscal policy. The effect on household incomes is relatively modest, with the main impact felt through higher energy bills in importing markets.
In this scenario, the product categories identified as being most susceptible to the shock – automotive (+6.8%), food (+10.3%), leisure & entertainment (+11.4%) and technology & electronics (+13.7%) – are mostly expected to record ad spend growth in line with the global rate.
The outlier is travel & transport, where spend is set to fall by 3.5% – equivalent to a net cut of $1.3bn. WARC understands that global airlines and tourism firms active in the Middle East are already holding back media budgets, and while these may be reallocated later in the year, high fuel prices and a squeeze on family incomes present serious headwinds for the sector.
Scenario B: An extended shock; oil elevated for 1-3 years, partial supply disruption
- Cuts 1.6pp from ad market growth this year, equivalent to $19.0bn dollars
- Sustains into 2027, removing a further $13.3bn from ad market growth – resulting in the erosion of up to $32.3bn from global growth over the next two years
- Removes 0.5pp from global GDP and adds 1.1pp to inflation resulting in modest real household spend
While this scenario is at the more severe end of those proposed by central banks, it is consistent with economic and advertising trends recorded during the 1991 Gulf War. It assumes that an oil price above $100 per barrel sustains over the two-year forecast period, resulting in monetary tightening by central banks in a bid to combat stagflation.
Real household spend is muted in this scenario, and the pass-through from the supply side shock hits the consumer-packaged goods (CPG) sector – particularly among products with supply chains dependent on grain and fertiliser – much harder than in our baseline scenario.
Scenario B presents a greater risk to the advertising and media industry, as consumer purchasing power is limited and businesses act to protect margins in a challenging trading environment. Here, we foresee ad growth in the food sector halving compared to our baseline, with consumer technology and leisure & entertainment spend growing behind the total market.
Scenario C: A severe, systemic shock; prolonged closure of Strait of Hormuz, oil reaching $150 per barrel
- A prolonged Gulf crisis removes 7.3pp and $93.9bn from ad market growth over the next two years
- Cuts 2.0pp from global economic expansion, adds 3.0pp to inflation, and real household spend falls year-on-year
- Ad spend growth flat or falling among over-exposed product categories
The prolonged Gulf crisis scenario assumes a persistent supply shock with strong second-round inflation, comparable to the 1973 oil crisis. This results in aggressive monetary tightening across key markets as central banks attempt to prevent mounting recessionary risks.
Consumer confidence collapses in this scenario, and real household spend falls year-on-year. As a result, ad spend growth is either flat – food (+0.7%), leisure & entertainment (+0.2%) – or falling; travel & transport could cut budgets by 5.8%.
Taken together, the global ad market would still grow 6.2% this year, but this is 4.2pp behind our baseline, equivalent to a cut of $49.9bn. The impacts of this severe market shock would carry into 2027, resulting in a further $44.0bn of lost growth versus our baseline.
|